Lumens are for Humans but PAR is for Plants!

Prism Splitting Light

Prism Splitting Light

It blew my ten-year-old mind when my “all knowing” grandmother told me that the Blue Jay we were watching was in fact not blue. She explained that light is composed of many colors, and it is the colors that are reflected, not absorbed that our eyes perceive as the color of an object. This is a necessary reminder that what is perceived might not be what it appears to be. For decades the indoor gardening community has used Lumens as the standard increment for the measurement of light. Lumens were unfortunately a poor choice, here’s why.

Diagram of How a Prism Works

Diagram of How a Prism Works
coutesey of freedigitalphotos.net

Lumens are essentially a measure of brightness based on human perception. Precisely, a lumen is equal to the light emitted by one candle falling on one square foot of surface located one foot away. This however presumes a human as the perceiver of the light. Plants “perceive” light differently; from a plant’s perspective, light that is useful for photosynthesis is not necessarily bright. Light, or more specifically, visible light is made up of wavelengths of energy on the electromagnetic spectrum ranging from 380-770 nm (nanometers). Plants utilize wavelengths from 400-700nm for photosynthesis. Brightness does not accurately describe if the light will be more or less useful to a plant.

Light can be characterized in other ways when discussing its benefit to plants. Color temperature is often referred to in the horticultural industry on lamp boxes to describe the color of the light emitted by the lamp. Does 4,000K grow a plant better than 7,500K? Color temperature is listed in Kelvin (K), which is a measurement of temperature. The temperature of what you might ask? It is a description of the relative whiteness of a piece of tungsten steel when heated to that particular temperature in degrees Kelvin. This accurately characterizes the color of the light as we perceive it, but color temperature again fails to address how effective a particular light source will be at providing the energy necessary to drive photosynthesis.

Don’t get frustrated by this inadequate information. There is in fact a measurement that precisely describes how effective a particular light will be for growing plants; PAR (Photosynthetic Active Radiation). PAR spectrum accounts only for light or more precisely photons emitted between 400-700nm. Scientists have concluded that it requires about 9 photons to bind one CO2 molecule in photosynthesis [6CO2 + 6H2O (+ light energy) C6H12O6 + 6O2]. Even though blue photons have more energy it has also been found that there is little difference between the effectiveness of red versus blue photons at driving photosynthesis as long as the photons are within the 400-700nm range. This leads to a direct correlation between the number of photons produced in the PAR spectrum by a given light, and the photosynthetic potential of that light.

Photons are emitted by light sources in very large numbers so we do not talk about billions or quadrillions of photons, instead we refer to them using the multiplier moles (which stand for 6.0221415 x 1023) To make the numbers even more accessible, the number of moles is often divided by 1 million resulting in micro-moles (μmol). Light sources emit photons continuously over time so the number of micro-moles is more accurately described as μmol/per unit of time (most commonly seconds).

When trying to quantify how effective a light source is beyond the total output of μmol/per second, you must consider one last piece of information… the size or area of your garden. Inevitably some of the photons produced will not reach your garden. So the most accurate representation of a light source’s ability to drive photosynthesis will take into account the area being lit and how many photons reach that given area per second; usually a square meters. That representation which actually summates the effectiveness of a light source for photosynthesis is written as μmol/m2/s. This descriptor is actually referred to as Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density or PPFD for short.

So in light of all of the information above, let’s remember that lumens are not a useful descriptor of a light’s ability to drive photosynthesis. I think I will sit back with a drink, and digest all of the information about PAR & PPFD while I watch the not blue Blue Jay outside my window.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s